The Future-Past Conceptualization of Assertiveness
Assertiveness is often discussed as a static personality trait — something one either possesses or lacks. However, deeper analysis reveals that assertiveness is one of the most fluid and dynamic traits, shaped by both internal cognitive processes and external reinforcement loops. Unlike more stable personality dimensions, assertiveness follows a recursive developmental cycle, growing or diminishing based on past experiences, subconscious suppression, and the ability to restructure these influences for future action.
To better conceptualize this non-linear trajectory of assertiveness, we turn to an evocative quote by David Lynch from Twin Peaks:
“Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see, one chance out between two worlds, fire walk with me.”
While seemingly cryptic, this passage provides a profound framework for understanding how assertiveness is developed, inhibited, and ultimately expanded. By breaking down each part of the quote through a psychological, existential, and neurobiological lens, we uncover how assertiveness is intrinsically tied to memory, suppression, cognitive restructuring, and fear confrontation.
The Darkness of Future Past – Non-Linear Time and Assertiveness Suppression
The phrase "Through the darkness of future past" encapsulates the way past experiences continue to influence present assertiveness, often below conscious awareness. Past failures and successes do not remain neutral but actively shape present assertiveness levels. These past experiences modulate serotonin regulation, which in turn affects confidence, risk-taking ability, and social dominance (DeYoung et al., 2007). Time is not processed linearly in assertiveness development. Instead, past events are stored as emotionally weighted imprints, which means failures and successes continue to shape self-perception even without conscious recall. Suppression distorts self-assessment. The mind actively inhibits access to painful memories, reducing emotional discomfort but also preventing cognitive integration and assertiveness growth.
The Magician and the Archetypal Need for Wisdom
In Jungian psychology, the Magician archetype represents the Wise Man, the internal figure seeking understanding and clarity (Jung, 1969). Assertiveness requires a “cognitive magician” — a meta-aware self that identifies, deciphers, and restructures suppressed fears. Without this process of conceptualization and integration, assertiveness remains stunted, leaving individuals trapped within self-limiting patterns of inhibition.
One Chance Out Between Two Worlds – The Moment of Cognitive Breakthrough
This phrase symbolizes existential transformation — the decision point between remaining trapped in the past or actively restructuring future assertiveness. Assertiveness expands when failures are restructured as learning mechanisms rather than permanent limitations. This aligns with self-actualization theory, processing past suppression, extracting insight, and integrating it into higher levels of self-command (Maslow, 1968). This moment represents the Kierkegaardian “Leap of Faith,” where one must confront the uncertainty of transformation and choose to transcend previous self-imposed limitations.
Fire Walk With Me – The Necessity of Destruction for Growth
The final line, "fire walk with me," represents psychological purification through confrontation, a process essential for assertiveness expansion. Fire represents the painful but necessary process of purging outdated self-conceptions, mistaken interpretations of past failures, and avoidance mechanisms. Cognitive exposure therapy demonstrates that facing suppressed fears permanently increases assertiveness (Carver et al., 2008). This aligns with Biblical imagery, particularly Genesis 3:24, where two cherubim with flaming swords guard the way back to Eden, symbolizing that true self-actualization requires passing through psychological fire.
The Future-Past Model: Assertiveness as a Cognitive Time Integration System
Present assertiveness is subconsciously shaped by past failures and successes. Suppression prevents full awareness of these past influences. Breaking free from suppression requires restructuring past experiences into a model for future growth. True assertiveness expansion occurs when an individual transcends past limitations and builds a self-actualizing future.
Conclusion
Assertiveness should not be viewed as an isolated personality trait, but rather as a cognitive system shaped by time, memory, and self-restructuring mechanisms. The concept of "future past" illustrates how past failures and successes remain active agents in the subconscious, subtly shaping confidence, decision-making, and risk tolerance. Only by confronting these suppressed influences can assertiveness be expanded in a meaningful way. By integrating Structured Internal Value Hierarchies (SIVHs), individuals gain a framework to reinterpret past experiences, align assertiveness with long-term meaning, and ensure that their future is not dictated by unprocessed failures. Ultimately, assertiveness is not about merely standing firm in the present — it is about integrating the wisdom of past experiences to create an unstoppable force for future self-mastery.
Some of the Resources used for the Article
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Carver, C. S., Johnson, S. L., & Joormann, J. (2008). Serotonergic function, two-mode models of self-regulation, and vulnerability to depression: What depression has in common with impulsive aggression. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 912–943.
Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Fear and Trembling. Reitzel.
The Holy Bible, Genesis 3:24.
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 533–552.
Jung, C. G. (1969). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Lesch, K. P., Bengel, D., Heils, A., Sabol, S. Z., Greenberg, B. D., Petri, S., Benjamin, J., Müller, C. R., Hamer, D. H., & Murphy, D. L. (1996). Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science, 274(5292), 1527–1531.
LeDoux, J. E. (2003). Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. Penguin Books.
Stangor, C., & Walinga, J. (2019). 4.4 Is Personality More Nature or More Nurture? Behavioural and Molecular Genetics. In Introduction to Psychology. BCcampus.
Ebstein, R. P., & Auerbach, J. G. (2001). Dopamine D4 receptor and serotonin transporter promoter polymorphisms and temperament in early childhood. Molecular Psychiatry, 6(4), 424–428.
